Pages: [1] |
1. Sov and Capital changes - Time line & commitment from CCP side - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Support
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.08.02 21:36:00
|
2. Jump Fuel Consumption based on ship size - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
No one cares
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.07.03 06:59:00
|
3. Jump Fuel Consumption based on ship size - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Do you think that someone cares?
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.06.16 08:54:00
|
4. Jump Fuel Consumption based on ship size - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
LIKE IT!
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.05.26 11:15:00
|
5. [Summer] Upcoming industry changes: Moon Mining - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Big alliances will not go into the wormholes - their capacity will block this
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.05.20 06:24:00
|
6. [Summer] Upcoming industry changes: Moon Mining - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
What about wormhole moons? Why people cannot mine there.
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.05.19 12:20:00
|
7. [Summer] Upcoming industry changes: Moon Mining - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
+1
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.05.19 06:30:00
|
8. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.x] Drone Assist change - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
50 drones is to much. Use the current fighter assist mechanic : Up to total drones you have on your ship. If incursion runners also abuse drone assist i don't see the reason why CCP didn't fix this earlier.
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.02.07 07:41:00
|
9. N3/PL new name for the coalition. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Silvetica Dian wrote: people that don't contribute to the war effort get purged? colour me shocked. But that's the point they are not purged , but forced to surrender their territory by NON coalition members. There is big difference - to ...
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.02.06 13:28:00
|
10. N3/PL new name for the coalition. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: as it turns out, collecting a bunch of me-too alliances into a coalition around tri mk xvii isn't and atlas 3.0 a sustainable model Is NC/PL hiding under your B0TLRD ? B0TShield Coalition? B0TLovers Coalition?
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.02.06 13:00:00
|
11. N3/PL new name for the coalition. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Chribba wrote: Well if they are going to start a renting thing they could always go with PLend They already rent : BOT is PL renting alliance , and whole EMP space will be added to it. Hard to say if NC will get some space from PL ( EMP) tha...
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.02.06 12:47:00
|
12. N3/PL new name for the coalition. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No. Simply Whyso is part of N3, PL is not. PL demands space from member N3 - and it have to give it - no other member of N3 have any intentions of defending their brethren. NC as a member of N3 demanded space from other member of N3 - COW. Si...
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.02.06 12:20:00
|
13. N3/PL new name for the coalition. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
N3 have collapsed. PL is demanding sov from members of N3 - and they have to obey - no member from N3 is defending their brethren from PL demands that will not end. Any one have idea about how to name this new coalition? Main players that will ...
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.02.06 11:55:00
|
14. Official CCP Policies - clarifications, and definitions needed. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Please read my posts. I don't have any issues with no reimbursement. CCP should clarify just what is Large - Scale Player Engagement. Because: - this will allow each player to be aware that they are in this position - cut all speculations why ...
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.01.24 11:24:00
|
15. When Insurance Fee/Payout will be Fixed? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dominix insurance is around 20 mil and the payout around 70mil. Hull itself around 200mil now.
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.01.24 08:20:00
|
16. Official CCP Policies - clarifications, and definitions needed. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: When TiDi kicks in -> Large scale fight Yesterday while moving 40 man gang thru gates we got TIDI. No gunfire ; local less than 50. That's the point why im asking for definition. Because as a players we can only...
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.01.24 08:15:00
|
17. Official CCP Policies - clarifications, and definitions needed. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lykouleon wrote: 1) If you don't know what a "large-scale player engagement" is, you shouldn't be undocking. 2) Large-scale engagements aren't against CCP policy. Reimbursing except for very obvious CCP screw-ups is usually denied by CCP. And, ...
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.01.23 08:11:00
|
18. Official CCP Policies - clarifications, and definitions needed. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Hello. Reimbursement policy is missing some important information. HED fight was classified as Large-scale player engagement and : "Any losses of any kind resulting from a large-scale player engagement are not covered by this reimbursement pol...
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.01.22 09:56:00
|
19. ESS modification - Death to Renting Empires. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
How big entities can easily control vast areas of eve? By creating one big alliance for all corporations while holding all power in the small holding corp controlled by few alts. I think if CCP will go 1 step more we can solve this issue. Lets...
- by Ian Ovaert - at 2014.01.16 11:48:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |